A Look at the Numbers

It's an inescapable fact that education is currently driven by data: numbers, scores, graphs, and charts are our main (only?) means of determining whether the ways and means by which our children are educated have value. Progress is key, and it is measured by an endless trail of formal assessments--buttons clicked, letters circled, and bubbles filled in. I see this again and again in the schools where I am working, from the time students enter kindergarten to the time they graduate high school. I think many people are interested in the alternative methods of education that I blog about (Waldorf, Reggio Emilia, etc), but are hesitant to embrace them because of their lack of emphasis on data. "Without the information gathered through assessment programs, how will we know that students are hitting their benchmarks?" they wonder. It's a very different frame of mind than the one I possess, but it is undeniably here to stay for the time being. And so I wonder: how do we convince those that are so very focused on assessment data that alternative models of education are effective?

Well, we can attempt to play the game and compare the numbers.

In October 2012, Larrison, Daily, and VanVooren published a study in Current Issues in Education titled "Twenty Years and Counting: A Look at Waldorf in the Public Sector Using Online Sources." This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Waldorf Education in public charter schools by comparing standardized test score data and parent comments with those from non-Waldorf public schools that teach using traditional educational methods. Waldorf charter schools (sometimes called "Waldorf-Methods" or "Waldorf-Inspired" charters) are one of the fastest-growing options for alternative education in the country. Waldorf-methods charter schools combine a Waldorf curriculum and environment with the standards of a public school. Their adherence to public school standards necessitates some adjustments, such as beginning formal reading instruction in kindergarten instead of in first grade, but the values and ethos of a Waldorf school remain. Literacy is imaginative and hands-on, stemming from poems, songs and verses, and stories are retold by students through dramatic play. The curriculum is arts-infused, and kindergartners learn their letters through pictures that gradually morph into the familiar symbols we know. Learning comes at a slow and steady pace, with students allowed to develop and flourish at a more individual rate than the hurried one that is pushed in many public school classrooms. Because Waldorf charters are funded publicly, though, students are required to take yearly standardized tests, just as they would in a traditional public school. Larrison et al use this scoring data to establish the efficacy of the Waldorf method as compared to traditional educational methods in their study.

The table above compares standardized testing scores between public Waldorf charters and district averages in the year 2008. In both reading and math, notice the trend that Waldorf students begin with lower test scores in the primary grades, but by eighth grade their scores have significantly surpassed students in schools with traditional methods.

The second set of graphs compares students in public Waldorf charters in California with students in non-Waldorf schools in the same or neighboring districts that share similar demographics. Again, the trend shows Waldorf students with lower test scores in earlier grades, but a jump to surpass their non-Waldorf peers by the later grades.

What does this study suggest? Larrison et al write, "The question this data presents is whether there
is any value at all of using test scores in determining the quality of education particularly in the early grades...Given that early test scores appear not to hold any predictive value for a student’s ultimate academic success, at least for Waldorf, and there is no reason to suspect these children are biologically unique, it is important that we reconsider the utility of early grade testing at all." They conclude that "[the] lack of correspondence of test scores to qualitative measures of schools performance should be a considerable concern for policy makers who support testing in the early grades. If we are to gauge schools based on test scores then these tests should at least be reliable measures of student outcomes in later grades. If not, then we must question the expense, time and stress of testing at all. Until reliable measures of school quality are available, the impact of testing should be minimized, especially in the lower grades."

In addition to bringing into question the effectiveness and rationale for standardized testing in the early grades, this study shows that a slower, more developmentally-appropriate approach to reading instruction in early childhood and the primary grades does not mean poor proficiency in the later grades. In fact, it shows the opposite: that the Waldorf approach to early literacy builds a foundation for future proficiency.

With this information in hand, perhaps we can move forward with providing young children with holistic, child-centered education in public schools.